We provide an example from our integrated math and science curriculum where students explore the mathematical relationships underlying various science phenomena. We present the tasks we designed for exploring the covariation relationships that underlie the concept of gravity and discuss the generalizations students made as they interacted with those tasks.

Notes

Students develop covariational reasoning skills as they explore a simulation that modifies the different factors that determine the force of gravity.

Blanton, Maria L., and James J.Kaput. 2011. “Functional Thinking as a Route into Algebra in the Elementary Grades.” In Early Algebraization: A Global Dialogue from Multiple Perspectives, edited by JinfaCai and EricKnuth, pp. 5–23. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Carlson, Marilyn, SallyJacobs, EdwardCoe, SeanLarsen, and EricHsu. 2002. “Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and a Study.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education33 (5): 352–78.

Carlson, Marilyn, SallyJacobs, EdwardCoe, SeanLarsen, and EricHsu. 2002. “Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and a Study.” )| false

Confrey, Jere, and ErickSmith. 1995. “Splitting, Covariation, and Their Role in the Development of Exponential Functions.” Journal For Research In Mathematics Education26 (1): 66–86.

Dugger, William E.2010. “Evolution of STEM in the United States.” Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Queensland, Australia, December 8–11, 2010.

Dugger, William E.2010. “Evolution of STEM in the United States.” Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Queensland, Australia, December 8–11, 2010.)| false

Moore, Kevin C., and Patrick W.Thompson. 2015. “Shape Thinking and Students' Graphing Activity.” In Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the MAA Special Interest Group on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, edited by TimFukawa-Connelly, Nicole E.Infante, KarenKeene, and MichelleZandieh, pp. 782–89, Pittsburgh, PA, February 19–21, 2015.

Moore, Kevin C., and Patrick W.Thompson. 2015. “Shape Thinking and Students' Graphing Activity.” In Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the MAA Special Interest Group on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, edited by TimFukawa-Connelly, Nicole E.Infante, KarenKeene, and MichelleZandieh, pp. 782–89, Pittsburgh, PA, February 19–21, 2015.)| false

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 2010. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: NGA Center and CCSSO. http://www.corestandards.org.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 2010. )| false

Pang, Jeong Suk, and RonGood. 2000. “A Review of the Integration of Science and Mathematics: Implications for Further Research.” School Science and Mathematics100 (2): 73–82.

Roschelle, Jeremy, DeborahTatar, NicoleShechtman, StephenHegedus, BillHopkins, JenniferKnudsen, and AntoinetteStroter. 2007. Can a Technology-Enhanced Curriculum Improve Student Learning of Important Mathematics?Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Roschelle, Jeremy, DeborahTatar, NicoleShechtman, StephenHegedus, BillHopkins, JenniferKnudsen, and AntoinetteStroter. 2007. Can a Technology-Enhanced Curriculum Improve Student Learning of Important Mathematics?Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.)| false

Smith, Jaimie, and P. J.Karr-Kidwell. 2000. “The Interdisciplinary Curriculum: A Literary Review and a Manual for Administrators and Teachers.” Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED443172).

Smith, Jaimie, and P. J.Karr-Kidwell. 2000. “The Interdisciplinary Curriculum: A Literary Review and a Manual for Administrators and Teachers.” Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED443172).)| false

Smith, John P. (Jack), III, and Patrick W.Thompson. 2017. “Quantitative Reasoning and the Development of Algebraic Reasoning.” In Algebra in the Early Grades, edited by James J.Kaput, David W.Carraher, and Maria L.Blanton, pp. 117–54. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Smith, John P. (Jack), III, and Patrick W.Thompson. 2017. “Quantitative Reasoning and the Development of Algebraic Reasoning.” In )| false

Thompson, Patrick W., and Marilyn P.Carlson. 2017. “Variation, Covariation, and Functions: Foundational Ways of Thinking Mathematically.” In Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, edited by JinfaCai, pp. 421–56, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Thompson, Patrick W., and Marilyn P.Carlson. 2017. “Variation, Covariation, and Functions: Foundational Ways of Thinking Mathematically.” In )| false