In this article, we share results from a field experience model in which junior-year methods classes were held in an elementary school and preservice teachers (PSTs) worked with a single student (a “Math Buddy") on mathematics for 30 minutes per day. We focus on the development of PSTs’ skills for exploring children’s thinking and the structures and tools that we used to support this development. Data sources include screencast recordings of interactions with Math Buddies and written reflections completed by PSTs. Although the responsiveness of interactions varied across individuals and interactions, in general, PSTs showed improvements in exploring children’s thinking. We share implications of these findings for similar field experience models and for practice-based approaches to teacher education generally.

Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. B. (2013). The impact of identity in K–8 mathematics: Rethinking equity-based practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. B. (2013). )| false

Amidon, J., Chazan, D., Grosser-Clarkson, D., & Fleming, E. (2017). Commentary: Meet me in Azul’s room: Designing a virtual field placement for learning to teach mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 6(1), 52–66.

Amidon, J., Chazan, D., Grosser-Clarkson, D., & Fleming, E. (2017). Commentary: Meet me in Azul’s room: Designing a virtual field placement for learning to teach mathematics. )| false

Anagnostopoulos, D., Smith, E. R., & Basmadjian, K. G. (2007). Bridging the university-school divide—Horizontal expertise and the “two-worlds pitfall."Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 138–152.

Anagnostopoulos, D., Smith, E. R., & Basmadjian, K. G. (2007). Bridging the university-school divide—Horizontal expertise and the “two-worlds pitfall.")| false

Baldinger, E. E., Selling, S. K., & Virmani, R. (2016). Supporting novice teachers in leading discussions that reach a mathematical point: Defining and clarifying mathematical ideas. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(1), 8–28.

Baldinger, E. E., Selling, S. K., & Virmani, R. (2016). Supporting novice teachers in leading discussions that reach a mathematical point: Defining and clarifying mathematical ideas. )| false

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L.Darling-Hammond & G.Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). Jossey-Bass.

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L.Darling-Hammond & G.Sykes (Eds.), )| false

Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.

Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. )| false

Bieda, K. N., Cavanna, J., & Ji, X. (2015). Mentor-guided lesson study as a tool to support learning in field experiences. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 4(1), 20–31.

Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194–222.

Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?)| false

Borko, H., Peressini, D., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., Willis-Yorker, C., Wooley, C., Hovermill, J., & Masarik, K. (2000). Teacher education does matter: A situative view of learning to teach secondary mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 193–206.

Borko, H., Peressini, D., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., Willis-Yorker, C., Wooley, C., Hovermill, J., & Masarik, K. (2000). Teacher education does matter: A situative view of learning to teach secondary mathematics. )| false

Campbell, S. S., & Dunleavy, T. K. (2016). Connecting university course work and practitioner knowledge through mediated field experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly, 43(3), 49–70.

Campbell, S. S., & Dunleavy, T. K. (2016). Connecting university course work and practitioner knowledge through mediated field experiences. )| false

Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., O’Connor, M. C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades K–6. Math Solutions.

Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., O’Connor, M. C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). )| false

Clarke, D., Clarke, B., & Roche, A. (2011). Building teachers’ expertise in understanding, assessing and developing children’s mathematical thinking: The power of task-based, one-to-one assessment interviews. ZDM, 43(6–7), 901–913.

Clarke, D., Clarke, B., & Roche, A. (2011). Building teachers’ expertise in understanding, assessing and developing children’s mathematical thinking: The power of task-based, one-to-one assessment interviews. )| false

Cochran-Smith, M., Villegas, A. M., Abrams, L., Chavez-Moreno, L., Mills, T., & Stern, R. (2015). Critiquing teacher education preparation research: An overview of the field, part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 109–121.

Cochran-Smith, M., Villegas, A. M., Abrams, L., Chavez-Moreno, L., Mills, T., & Stern, R. (2015). Critiquing teacher education preparation research: An overview of the field, part II. )| false

Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 243–270.

Empson, S. B., Jacobs, V. R., Krause, G., & Jessup, N. (2018). Fraction story-problem cards (English and Spanish). Montezuma Publishing, San Diego State University.

Empson, S. B., Jacobs, V. R., Krause, G., & Jessup, N. (2018). )| false

Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. )| false

Grossman, P., Ronfeldt, M., & Cohen, J. J. (2012). The power of setting: The role of field experience in learning to teach. In K. R.Harris, S.Graham, T.Urdan, A. G.Bus, S.Major, & H. L.Swanson (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching (pp. 311–334). American Psychological Association.

Grossman, P., Ronfeldt, M., & Cohen, J. J. (2012). The power of setting: The role of field experience in learning to teach. In K. R.Harris, S.Graham, T.Urdan, A. G.Bus, S.Major, & H. L.Swanson (Eds.), )| false

Jackson, K. J., Shahan, E. C., Gibbons, L. K., & Cobb, P. A. (2012). Launching a complex task. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(1), 24–29.

Jacobs, V., Ambrose, R., Philipp, R., & Martin, H. (2011, April). Exploring one-on-one teacher-student conversations during mathematical problem solving. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

Jacobs, V., Ambrose, R., Philipp, R., & Martin, H. (2011, April). )| false

Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (2016). Responding to children’s mathematical thinking in the moment: an emerging framework of teaching moves. ZDM, 48(1–2), 185–197.

Kazemi, E. (2018). Teaching a mathematics methods course: Understanding learning from a situative perspective. In S. E.Kastberg, A. M.Tyminski, A. E.Lischka, & W. B.Sanchez (Eds.), Building support for scholarly practices in mathematics methods (Vol. 3, pp. 49–65). Information Age.

Kazemi, E. (2018). Teaching a mathematics methods course: Understanding learning from a situative perspective. In S. E.Kastberg, A. M.Tyminski, A. E.Lischka, & W. B.Sanchez (Eds.), )| false

Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.

Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. )| false

Schwartz, C. (2015). Developing the practice of teacher questioning through a K-2 elementary mathematics field experience. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(3), 30–50.

Smith, M. S., Bill, V., Sherin, M. G., & Meyer, D. (2020). The 5 practices in practice: Successfully orchestrating mathematics discussions in your elementary classroom. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Smith, M. S., Bill, V., Sherin, M. G., & Meyer, D. (2020). )| false

Spangler, D. A., & Hallman-Thrasher, A. (2014). Using task dialogues to enhance preservice teachers’ abilities to orchestrate discourse. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(1), 58–75.

Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304–322.

Webel, C., & Dwiggins, A. (2019). Prospective elementary teachers’ experiences with and perspectives on grouping by ability in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 21(2), 4–23.

Webel, C., & Dwiggins, A. (2019). Prospective elementary teachers’ experiences with and perspectives on grouping by ability in mathematics. )| false

Webel, C., & Hopkins, S. (2019). How an immersive school-based partnership surfaced critical tensions in practice for preservice teachers. In S.Otten, A. G.Candela, Z.de Araujo, C.Haines, & C.Munter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 671–675). University of Missouri.

Webel, C., & Hopkins, S. (2019). How an immersive school-based partnership surfaced critical tensions in practice for preservice teachers. In S.Otten, A. G.Candela, Z.de Araujo, C.Haines, & C.Munter (Eds.), )| false

Wieman, R., & Webel, C. (2019). Patterns linking interpreting and deciding how to respond during the launch of a lesson: Noticing from an integrated perspective. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 21(1), 28–50.

Wieman, R., & Webel, C. (2019). Patterns linking interpreting and deciding how to respond during the launch of a lesson: Noticing from an integrated perspective. )| false

Yeo, S., & Webel, C. (2019). Preservice teachers’ use of noticing practices to evaluate technological resources. In S.Otten, A. G.Candela, Z.de Araujo, C.Haines, & C.Munter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 1048–1056). University of Missouri.

Yeo, S., & Webel, C. (2019). Preservice teachers’ use of noticing practices to evaluate technological resources. In S.Otten, A. G.Candela, Z.de Araujo, C.Haines, & C.Munter (Eds.), )| false

Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.

Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. )| false